It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait
Discuto
Best practices to support the defining of adequate broadband internet access service
Starting: 10 Dec
Ending
0 days left (ends 27 Jan)
Go to discussion, participate and give your opinion
description
Further info
LATEST ACTIVITY
LEVEL OF AGREEMENT
MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS
No activity yet
LATEST COMMENTS
No activity yet
MOST ACTIVE USERS
No activity yet
Status:
Closed
Privacy:
Public
CONTRIBUTORS (5)
Share:
_
filter:
All Most voted (0) Most comments (0) Controversial (0) Decided (0)
In voting (0)
Supported (0) My contributions (0)
view:
<< Previous paragraphs
P86
PTS’ report on the review of the level for functional Internet access (PTS-ER-2017:8):
https://www.pts.se/contentassets/5e53eb81b0f84474b199babd5528a11b/oversyn-niva-funktionellt-tilltrade-internet-pts-er-2017_8.pdf
Governmental regulation (SFS 2018:20):
https://riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/forordning-201820-om-stod-for-atgarder-som-ger_sfs-2018-20
Add comment
P88
Ofcom, June 2018. Implementing the Broadband Universal Service Obligation: request for expressions of interest in serving as Universal Service Provider for broadband.
Ofcom, September 2018. Implementing the Broadband Universal Service Obligation: consultation on designation regulations
Ofcom, December 2018. Delivering the Broadband Universal Service: Proposals for designating providers and applying conditions.
Ofcom, June 2019. Delivering the Broadband Universal Service – Statement: Designating Universal Service Providers and setting conditions
The Communications Act 2003
Add comment
P93
[3] Annex V - Minimum set of services which the adequate broadband internet access service in accordance with Article 84(3) shall be capable of supporting, Directive (EU) 2018/1972.
Add comment
P94
[4] BoR (18) 240 “BEREC Work Programme 2019” page 30. It was initially proposed in the work programme that the report would also look into criteria that MS might use to deem that an available adequate broadband internet access service, not provided at a fixed location, should be made available at an affordable price in order to ensure consumers’ full social and economic participation in society. BEREC later confirmed that “the criteria that MS might use to deem that an available adequate broadband IAS, not provided at a fixed location, should be made available at an affordable price in order to ensure consumers’ full social and economic participation in society” is outside of the scope of the BEREC report on MS’ best practices to support the defining of adequate broadband IAS, and therefore this report will not reflect this element.
Add comment
P95
[5] European Commission Information Society and Media Directorate General, Communications Committee Working Document “Implementation of the revised Universal Service Directive: internet related aspects of Article 4”, COCOM10-31 Final, Brussels, 10 January 2011.
Add comment
P96
[6] Review of the Scope of Universal Service SMART number: 2014/0011. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6eee3cb7-9adf-11e6-868c-01aa75ed71a1
Add comment
P97
[7] “BEREC update survey on the implementation and application of the universal service provisions – a synthesis of the results”, BoR (17) 41.
Add comment
P98
[8] “EC questionnaire on the implementation and application of the universal service provisions – a synthesis of the results”, BoR (14) 95.
Add comment
P99
[9] eGovernment benchmark 2018 Securing eGovernment for all” https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/egovernment-benchmark-2018-digital-efforts-european-countries-are-visibly-paying “.
Add comment
P100
[10] The paper outlines a set of criteria that MS could be asked to consider when making their decision.
Add comment
P102
[12] However the main element of BIPT’s analysis was the fact that setting a speed of 1 Mbit/s makes a large set of services possible (surfing the internet, e-mailing, social networks, e-commerce, e-government, looking for a job on the internet, etc.) and does not pose a risk of social exclusion.
Add comment
P103
[13] No information available in relation to the evaluation criteria employed by Spain. See ANNEX 3 for further clarification.
Add comment
P104
[14] COCOM Working Document “Implementation of the revised Universal Service Directive: internet-related aspects of Article 4” (COCOM10-31 FINAL).
Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.