It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait
Discuto
Draft BEREC Report on the handling of third-party payment charges on mobile phone bills
0 days left (ends 16 Apr)
description
Further info
LATEST ACTIVITY
LEVEL OF AGREEMENT
MOST DISCUSSED PARAGRAPHS
LATEST COMMENTS
MOST ACTIVE USERS
P63
[189] For the purposes of this Report free voice notification informing the caller of the premium rate tariff, is not considered as an alert service.
P74
[200] Belgium clarified after submission of its responses to the questionnaire that “explicit consent” was interpreted as referring to an additional consent measure, in addition to the end-user’s consent given during his application for subscription services.
P80
[221] One NRA mentioned that the Ombuds is considered as alternative dispute resolution (BE). Another NRA mentioned that a complaint can only be filed if the billed service is supplied by an electronic communications service provider (LT).
P81
[222] Mobile service operator Yes: AT, BE, BG, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, EL ES, FI, FR, HR, HU, IT, LT, LV, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, SE, SK. / Mobile service operator No: IE. / Mobile service operator no answer: none.
Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.