Amendment 501 Victor Negrescu [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. Calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from introducing statutory licences for the compensation of rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception; 21. Deplores the introduction of statutory licenses in some member states aimed at news aggregators for acts already made permissible by an exception and calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from unilaterally introducing such schemes, which can cause significant damage to the digital economy;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 502 Helga Trüpel, Heidi Hautala [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf zu verhindern, dass Mitgliedstaaten gesetzliche Lizenzen zur Entschädigung von Rechtsinhabern für den Schaden einführen, der ihnen durch eine Handlung entsteht, die aufgrund einer Ausnahme zulässig ist; 21. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf zu verhindern, dass Mitgliedsstaaten gesetzliche Lizenzen zur Entschädigung von Rechtsinhabern vermeintlicher Schäden in Form eines Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverlage einführen.Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 503 Julia Reda, Victor Negrescu, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. Calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from introducing statutory licences for the compensation of rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception; 21. Deplores the introduction of statutory licenses in some member states aimed at news aggregators for acts already made permissible by an exception and calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from unilaterally introducing such schemes, which can cause significant damage to the digital economy;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 504 Mary Honeyball [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. Calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from introducing statutory licences for the compensation of rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception; 21. Invites the Commission to analyse the necessity of meaures, if any, to be implemented by Member States so as to provide compensation to rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception while they should ensure that rightholders receive fair compensation and that the exceptions of limitiations do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 505 Cecilia Wikström [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. Calls on the EU legislator to preclude Member States from introducing statutory licences for the compensation of rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception; 21. Calls on the EU legislator to protect consumers by precluding Member States from introducing statutory licences for the compensation of rightholders for the harm caused by acts made permissible by an exception;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 506 Enrico Gasbarra [Change] § 21 Motion for a resolution [By] 21. invita il legislatore unionale a impedire agli Stati membri di introdurre licenze finalizzate a risarcire i titolari di diritti dai danni causati da atti consentiti da un'eccezione; 21. invita il legislatore unionale a impedire agli Stati membri di introdurre licenze finalizzate a risarcire i titolari di diritti dai danni causati da atti consentiti da un'eccezione legalmente ammessa dalla propria legislazione;Or. (Origine IT)

Amendment 507 Pascal Durand [Change] § 21 a (new) : 21 a. Requests the Commission to explore the various legal bases at EU level that are necessary to allow, as EU rule or in Member States, the legalization of non commercial private sharing between individuals of digital works, which is a right of EU citizens that should not be jeopardized by copyright rules;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 508 Marietje Schaake [Change] § 21 b (new) : 21 b. Calls for ensuring access to information for persons with a disability, which is directly related to the disability and of a non-commercial nature;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 509 Julia Reda, Christian Ehler, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 21 c (new) : 21 c. Deplores the lack of harmonisation between Member States as regards the interpretation of Article 5.2 b of Directive 2001/29/EC on exceptions for reproductions on any medium made by a natural person for private use, and as regards the remuneration schemes to compensate for the prejudice to rightholders put in place in some Member States to allow for the fair compensation of the rightholders in relation to these acts of copying, which affects the functioning of the internal market;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 510 Jean-Marie Cavada (FR)
[Want to Change] § 22
demande l'adoption de critères harmonisés en ce qui concerne la définition du préjudice causé aux titulaires de droits à l'égard des reproductions effectuées par une personne physique pour un usage privé et de mesures de transparence harmonisées concernant les redevances pour copie privée mises en place dans certains États membres13 ;
__________________

13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie.
[By] 22. souligne que le système de copie privée représente un système vertueux et équilibré entre l'exception pour copie à usage privé et le droit à une compensation équitable des ayants droit, qu'il est judicieux de préserver;
__________________

13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie.

Amendment 511 Marie-Christine Boutonnet [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. demande l'adoption de critères harmonisés en ce qui concerne la définition du préjudice causé aux titulaires de droits à l'égard des reproductions effectuées par une personne physique pour un usage privé et de mesures de transparence harmonisées concernant les redevances pour copie privée mises en place dans certains États membres13 ; 22. ll conviendrait de trouver le juste équilibre entre les intérêts de l'auteur et ceux du public; Le droit de reproduction, d'adaptation, des copies de sauvegarde est autorisé, dès lors que la source de la copie est licite.__________________ 13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie. Or. (Origine FR)

Amendment 512 Cecilia Wikström [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; 22. Underlines that citizens in all Member States should have a legal right to make private copies for their own use of legally acquired content without having to pay extra compensation to right holders through cumbersome and illogical levies on technical devices; thus urges the commission to propose a fully harmonised private copy exception which would not cause harm to right holders and which would thus not need to be compensated through a levy system;__________________ 13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies. Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 513 Helga Trüpel [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. fordert die Annahme harmonisierter Kriterien für die Feststellung des Schadens für Rechtsinhaber in Bezug auf Vervielfältigungen, die von einer natürlichen Person für den privaten Gebrauch angefertigt wurden, und die Annahme harmonisierter Transparenzvorschriften über die Abgaben für Privatkopien, die in manchen Mitgliedstaaten erhoben werden13 ; 22. fordert den Gesetzgeber auf, das Recht auf (digitale) Privatkopie bei gleichzeitiger Abgabe für eine angemessener Vergütung sicher zu stellen, die nicht technisch eingeschränkt werden darf.__________________ __________________13 Vgl. die Empfehlungen von António Vitorino vom 31.Januar 2013, die sich aus der jüngst von der Kommission durchgeführten Schlichtung über die Abgaben für private Kopien und private Vervielfältigung ergeben. 13 Vgl. die Empfehlungen von António Vitorino vom 31.Januar 2013, die sich aus der jüngst von der Kommission durchgeführten Schlichtung über die Abgaben für private Kopien und private Vervielfältigung ergeben.Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 514 Constance Le Grip, Marc Joulaud, Jean-Marie Cavada, Sabine Verheyen (FR)
[Want to Change] § 22
22. demande l'adoption de critères harmonisés en ce qui concerne la définition du préjudice causé aux titulaires de droits à l'égard des reproductions effectuées par une personne physique pour un usage privé et de mesures de transparence harmonisées concernant les redevances pour copie privée mises en place dans certains États membres13 ;
__________________
13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie.
[By] 22. rappelle la résolution du Parlement européen de février 2014 qui souligne l'intérêt du système de rémunération pour copie privée dans la recherche d'un équilibre entre les intérêts des consommateurs et ceux des ayants-droits;
__________________
13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie.

Amendment 515 Mary Honeyball [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; 22. Suggests a review of the liability of service providers and intermediaries in order to clarify their legal status and liability with regards to copyright, in order to guarantee and to ensure a fair remuneration for creators and rightholders within the EU;__________________ __________________13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies. 13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies.Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 516 Axel Voss [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. fordert die Annahme harmonisierter Kriterien für die Feststellung des Schadens für Rechtsinhaber in Bezug auf Vervielfältigungen, die von einer natürlichen Person für den privaten Gebrauch angefertigt wurden, und die Annahme harmonisierter Transparenzvorschriften über die Abgaben für Privatkopien, die in manchen Mitgliedstaaten erhoben werden13 ; 22. stellt fest, dass eine weiterführende Prüfung der transparenten Umsetzung von Maßnahmen wie der Abgabe für Privatkopienzum gerechten Ausgleichfür Rechtsinhaber in Bezug auf Vervielfältigungen, die von einer natürlichen Person für den privaten Gebrauch angefertigt wurden, notwendig zum Schutz von Urheber- und Verbraucherrechten ist;__________________ __________________13 Vgl. die Empfehlungen von António Vitorino vom 31.Januar 2013, die sich aus der jüngst von der Kommission durchgeführten Schlichtung über die Abgaben für private Kopien und private Vervielfältigung ergeben. 13 Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 517 Therese Comodini Cachia, Eva Paunova, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, József Szájer, Giovanni Toti, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Sabine Verheyen [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; 22. Notes that further analysis is necessary on the viability of measures to the fair compensation of rightholders in respect of reproductions made by natural persons for private use, in particular in regard to more transparency and better optimalisation for the existing measures as digital levies to safeguard rightholder and consumer rights;__________________ 13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies. Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 518 József Szájer [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; 22. Notes that further analysis is necessary on the viability of measures to the fair compensation of rightholders in respect of reproductions made by natural persons for private use, in particular in regard to more transparency and better optimalisation for the existing measures as digital levies to safeguard rightholder and consumer rights;__________________ __________________13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies. 13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies.Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 519 Virginie Rozière, Jean-Marie Cavada (FR)
[Want to Change] § 22
demande l'adoption de critères harmonisés en ce qui concerne la définition du préjudice causé aux titulaires de droits à l'égard des reproductions effectuées par une personne physique pour un usage privé et de mesures de transparence harmonisées concernant les redevances pour copie privée mises en place dans certains États membres13 ;
__________________

13 Comme mentionné dans les recommandations d'António Vitorino du 31 janvier 2013 découlant du dernier processus de médiation mené par la Commission en ce qui concerne les redevances pour copie privée et reprographie.
[By] 22. rappelle l'importance de la compensation équitable du préjudice causé aux titulaires de droits à l'égard des reproductions effectuées par une personne physique pour un usage privé;

Amendment 520 Angel Dzhambazki, Sajjad Karim [Change] § 22 Motion for a resolution [By] 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; 22. Calls for the adoption of harmonised criteria for defining the harm caused to rightholders in respect of reproductions made by a natural person for private use, taking into account recital 35 of the Directive, which recognises that harm to rightholders in some circumstances is minimal and no payment is made, and for harmonised transparency measures as regards the private copying levies put in place in some Member States13 ; Draws attention to thethe discretion of Member States to provide alternative modes of compensation to levies;__________________ __________________13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies. 13 As stated in António Vitorino’s recommendations of 31 January 2013 resulting from the latest mediation process conducted by the Commission in respect of private copying and reprography levies.Or. (Origine EN)