Amendment 521 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg [Change] § 22 [By] 22. chiede l'adozione di criteri armonizzati per la definizione del danno causato ai titolari di diritti da riproduzioni effettuate da una persona fisica per uso privato, e di misure di trasparenza armonizzate per quanto riguarda i prelievi per copie private messi in atto in alcuni Stati membri13 ; 22. chiede l'adozione di criteri armonizzati, stabiliti sulla base di studi scientificamente comprovati, per la definizione del danno causato ai titolari di diritti da riproduzioni effettuate da una persona fisica per uso privato, e di misure di trasparenza armonizzate per quanto riguarda i prelievi per copie private messi in atto in alcuni Stati membri13 ;__________________ __________________13 Come espresso nelle raccomandazioni di António Vitorino, del 31 gennaio 2013, risultanti dal più recente processo di mediazione svolto dalla Commissione sui prelievi per copia e riproduzione privata. 13 Come espresso nelle raccomandazioni di António Vitorino, del 31 gennaio 2013, risultanti dal più recente processo di mediazione svolto dalla Commissione sui prelievi per copia e riproduzione privata.Or. (Origine IT)

Amendment 522 Laura Ferrara [Change] § 22. chiede l'adozione di criteri armonizzati per la definizione del danno causato ai titolari di diritti da riproduzioni effettuate da una persona fisica per uso privato, e di misure di trasparenza armonizzate per quanto riguarda i prelievi per copie private messi in atto in alcuni Stati membri13 ;__________________ 13 Come espresso nelle raccomandazioni di António Vitorino, del 31 gennaio 2013, risultanti dal più recente processo di mediazione svolto dalla Commissione sui prelievi per copia e riproduzione privata. [By] 22. chiede l'adozione di criteri armonizzati, stabiliti sulla base di studi scientificamente comprovati, per la definizione del danno causato ai titolari di diritti da riproduzioni effettuate da una persona fisica per uso privato, e di misure di trasparenza armonizzate per quanto riguarda i prelievi per copie private messi in atto in alcuni Stati membri13 ;__________________ 13 Come espresso nelle raccomandazioni di António Vitorino, del 31 gennaio 2013, risultanti dal più recente processo di mediazione svolto dalla Commissione sui prelievi per copia e riproduzione privata. (Origine IT)

Amendment 523 Laura Ferrara [Change] § 22 a (new) : 22 a. osserva che il il diritto di prelievo per copia privata debba essere disciplinato in maniera tale da informare i cittadini sull'entità effettiva, sulle finalità e sulle modalità di utilizzazione del prelievo;Or. (Origine IT)

Amendment 524 Christian Ehler, Sabine Verheyen, Marc Joulaud [Change] § 22 b (new) : 22 b. Stresses that digital levies should be made more transparent and optimised to safeguard rightholder and consumer rights and by taking into account Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26February2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 525 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 22 c (new) : 22 c. Invites the Commission to include alternative types of remuneration in the Directive 2001/29/EG to ensure a faire balance between the copyright owner and the user;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 526 Marietje Schaake [Change] § 22 d (new) : 22 d. Cautions against private enforcement of copyright to ensure a clear separation of powers, and the appropriate judicial and democratic oversight;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 527 Julia Reda, Josef Weidenholzer, Dietmar Köster [Change] § 22 e (new) : 22 e. Proposes to strengthen authors' rights by making remuneration rights tied to exceptions and limitations non-transferable to other rightholders;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 528 Evelyn Regner, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 22 f (new) : 22 f. Asks for further clarification that in the light of a fair balance, no double remuneration should be charged, if the user makes a backup copy, where no harm is caused. The remuneration should refer to the actual damage.Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 529 Constance Le Grip [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. souligne que l'exercice efficace des exceptions ou limitations ainsi que l'accès au contenu qui n'est pas soumis à la protection du droit d'auteur ou des droits voisins ne devraient pas être entravés par des mesures technologiques; suppriméOr. (Origine FR)

Amendment 530 Virginie Rozière (FR)
[Want to Delete] § 23
23. souligne que l'exercice efficace des exceptions ou limitations ainsi que l'accès au contenu qui n'est pas soumis à la protection du droit d'auteur ou des droits voisins ne devraient pas être entravés par des mesures technologiques;

Amendment 531 Angelika Niebler [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. betont, dass die effektive Anwendung von Ausnahmen oder Beschränkungen und der Zugang zu Inhalten, die nicht Schutzgegenstand des Urheberrechts oder verwandter Schutzrechte sind, nicht durch technische Maßnahmen behindert werden sollten; 23. betont, dass insbesondere im digitalen Zeitalter der Einsatz technischer Schutzmaßnahmen erlaubt werden sollte, die das Gleichgewicht zwischen der freien Vervielfältigung (z. B.im Rahmen der Privatkopie) und das Ausschließlichkeitsrecht auf Vervielfältigung wieder herstellt;Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 532 Cecilia Wikström [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures; 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures and that member states should have sufficent enforcement measures in place to deter any such actions;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 533 Jean-Marie Cavada, Virginie Rozière (FR)
[Want to Change] § 23 souligne que l'exercice efficace des exceptions ou limitations ainsi que l'accès au contenu qui n'est pas soumis à la protection du droit d'auteur ou des droits voisins ne devraient pas être entravés par des mesures technologiques;
[By] § 23. note que l'exercice efficace des exceptions ou limitations ainsi que l'accès au contenu qui n'est pas soumis à la protection du droit d'auteur ou des droits voisins est garanti par l'article 6 (4) de la directive 2001/29/CE;

Amendment 534 Marie-Christine Boutonnet [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. souligne que l'exercice efficace des exceptions ou limitations ainsi que l'accès au contenu qui n'est pas soumis à la protection du droit d'auteur ou des droits voisins ne devraient pas être entravés par des mesures technologiques; 23. La notion du principe deterritorialité doit être respectée;Or. (Origine FR)

Amendment 535 Julia Reda, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures; 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures or contractual terms;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 536 Pascal Durand [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures; 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be waived by contract or hindered by technological measures of protection oronline contracts inthe digital environment;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 537 Angel Dzhambazki, Sajjad Karim [Change] § 23 Motion for a resolution [By] 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be hindered by technological measures; 23. Stresses that the effective exercise of exceptions or limitations, and access to content that is not subject to copyright or related rights protection, should not be undulyhindered by technological measures;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 538 Christian Ehler, Sabine Verheyen, Marc Joulaud [Change] § 23 a (new) : 23 a. Points out that the rapid rate of technological development in the digital market calls for a technologically neutral legislative framework for copyrights;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 539 Kostas Chrysogonos

Amendment 540 Constance Le Grip [Change] § 24 Motion for a resolution [By] 24. recommande de subordonner la protection juridique contre le contournement de toute mesure technologique efficace à la publication du code source ou de la spécification de l'interface afin de garantir l'intégrité des appareils sur lesquels les protections technologiques sont employées et de faciliter l'interopérabilité; estime notamment que, lorsque le contournement des mesures technologiques est permis, des moyens technologiques visant à réaliser ce contournement autorisé doivent être disponibles; suppriméOr. (Origine FR)