Discuto is Loading your document from Drive

It can take a while depending on the size of the document..please wait

Discuto is submitting your document

It might take a while depending on the size of the document you uploaded..

Discuto is creating your discussion

Please do not close this window.

Discuto is submitting your comment

Did you know you can vote on comments? You can also reply directly to people's comments.

Your invites are being queued for sending

This might take some time depending on the number of invites, please do not close this window.

Discuto

Discuto

juri_am-2015-549469_xm

Starting: 12 Mar Ending

0 days left (ends 14 Apr)

Go to discussion, participate and give your opinion

description

Committee on Legal Affairs 05/03/2015

--- AMENDMENTS 281 - 556 ---

Draft report Julia Reda (PE546.580v02-00) on the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspect


/!\ >> AMENDMENTS 1 - 280 >> There
The draft report is there :  FR , EN , DE
Next steps : 
March 23/24, 2015 Discussion of these amendments in the Legal Affairs Committee
April 16, 2015 Vote in the Legal Affairs Committee
May 20, 2015 Vote in plenary

 

Further info

Status: Closed
Privacy: Public

CONTRIBUTORS (2)

Share:
_
<< Previous paragraphs

P101

Amendment 381 Helga Trüpel, Heidi Hautala [Change] § 13 Motion for a resolution [By] 13. fordert die Annahme einer offenen Norm, die eine flexible Auslegung von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen in bestimmten Sonderfällen ermöglicht, in denen die normale Verwertung des Werks nicht beeinträchtigt wird und die berechtigten Interessen der Urheber oder Rechtsinhaber nicht ungebührlich verletzt werden; 13. fordert die Prüfung einer offenen Norm, die es ermöglicht auf neue Technologien und Sachverhalte zeitnah zu reagieren und eine flexible Auslegung von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen in bestimmten Sonderfällen ermöglicht, in denen die normale Verwertung des Werks nicht beeinträchtigt wird und die berechtigten Interessen der Urheber oder Rechtsinhaber nicht ungebührlich verletzt werden, unter der Anwendung des 3 Stufen Tests.Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Add comment

P102

Amendment 382 Angel Dzhambazki, Sajjad Karim [Change] § 13 a (new) : 13 a. Calls for exceptions and limitations which have an appropriate level of flexibility and are technologically neutral;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P103

Amendment 383 Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux (FR)
[Want to Change] § 14
prie instamment le législateur européen de garantir la neutralité technologique et la future compatibilité des exceptions et limitations en tenant dûment compte des effets de la convergence des médias; estime notamment que l'exception de citation devrait expressément inclure les citations audiovisuelles dans son champ d'application;
[By] 14. estime que l'exception de citation devrait continuer à être définie de manière stricte, tout en incluant la possibilité d'être étendue aux citations audiovisuelles;

Add comment

P104

Amendment 384 Tadeusz Zwiefka, Bogdan Brunon Wenta [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope; 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P105

Amendment 385 József Szájer [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope; 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations while serving the public interest by fostering incentives to create, finance and distribute new works and to make those works available to the public in new, innovative and compelling ways;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P106

Amendment 386 Axel Voss [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf, die Technologieneutralität und Zukunftsverträglichkeit von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen zu gewährleisten, indem die Auswirkungen der Medienkonvergenz gebührend berücksichtigt werden; ist insbesondere der Ansicht, dass die Ausnahme für Zitate ausdrücklich auch für audiovisuelle Zitate gelten sollte; 14. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf, die Technologieneutralität und Zukunftsverträglichkeit von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen zu gewährleisten;Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Add comment

P107

Amendment 387 Enrico Gasbarra [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. esorta il legislatore unionale a garantire la neutralità tecnologica e la compatibilità futura delle eccezioni e limitazioni, tenendo conto degli effetti della convergenza dei media; ritiene, in particolare, che l'ambito di applicazione dell'eccezione per le citazioni dovrebbe includere esplicitamente le citazioni audiovisive; 14. esorta il legislatore unionale a garantire la neutralità tecnologica e la compatibilità futura delle eccezioni e limitazioni, tenendo conto degli effetti della convergenza dei media;Or. (Origine IT)

Add comment

P108

Amendment 388 Angelika Niebler [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf, die Technologieneutralität und Zukunftsverträglichkeit von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen zu gewährleisten, indem die Auswirkungen der Medienkonvergenz gebührend berücksichtigt werden; ist insbesondere der Ansicht, dass die Ausnahme für Zitate ausdrücklich auch für audiovisuelle Zitate gelten sollte; 14. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf, die Technologieneutralität und Zukunftsverträglichkeit von Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen zu gewährleisten, indem die Auswirkungen der Medienkonvergenz gebührend berücksichtigt werden;Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Add comment

P109

Amendment 389 Victor Negrescu [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope; 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; therefore calls on the EU legislator to expressly include audio-visual quotations in the existing quotation exception in order to enable the use of quotations in new media formats; these quotations should be adequate in terms of length in relation to the type of source material;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P110

Amendment 390 Constance Le Grip, Marc Joulaud, Sabine Verheyen (FR)
[Want to Change] § 14
prie instamment le législateur européen de garantir la neutralité technologique et la future compatibilité des exceptions et limitations en tenant dûment compte des effets de la convergence des médias; estime notamment que l'exception de citation devrait expressément inclure les citations audiovisuelles dans son champ d'application;
[By] 14. prie instamment le législateur européen de garantir la neutralité technologique et la future compatibilité des exceptions et limitations en tenant dûment compte des effets de la convergence des médias;

Add comment

P111

Amendment 391 Julia Reda, Victor Negrescu, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope; 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; therefore calls on the EU legislator to expressly include audio-visual quotations in the existing quotation exception in order to enable the use of quotations in new media formats; these quotations should be adequate in terms of length in relation to the type of source material;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P112

Amendment 392 Therese Comodini Cachia, Eva Paunova, Jean-Marie Cavada, Constance Le Grip, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, József Szájer, Giovanni Toti, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Milan Zver, Sabine Verheyen (EN)
[Want to Change] § 14
Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope;
[By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations while serving the public interest by fostering incentives to create, finance and distribute new works and to make those works available to the public in new, innovative and compelling ways;

Add comment

P113

Amendment 393 Mary Honeyball, Silvia Costa [Change] § 14 Motion for a resolution [By] 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations by taking due account of the effects of media convergence; considers, in particular, that the exception for quotation should expressly include audio-visual quotations in its scope; 14. Urges the European legislator to ensure the technological neutrality and future-compatibility of exceptions and limitations while fostering incentives to create, finance and distribute new works and to make those works available to the public in new, innovative and compelling ways;Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment

P114

Amendment 394 Jean-Marie Cavada, Therese Comodini Cachia (FR)
[Want to Change] § 14
prie instamment le législateur européen de garantir la neutralité technologique et la future compatibilité des exceptions et limitations en tenant dûment compte des effets de la convergence des médias; estime notamment que l'exception de citation devrait expressément inclure les citations audiovisuelles dans son champ
[By] 14. prie instamment le législateur européen de garantir la neutralité technologique et la future compatibilité des exceptions et limitations en tenant dûment compte des effets de la convergence des médias;

Add comment

P115

Amendment 395 Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg

Add comment

P116

Amendment 396 Enrico Gasbarra [Change] § 14 a (new) : 14 a. Prende atto con interesse della recente regolamentazione statunitense in materia di net neutrality, appena varata dalla Federal Communications Commission statunitense; invita la Commissione a valutare quale ispirazione trarre dalla nuova normativa nel quadro della riforma della direttiva 2001/29;Or. (Origine IT)

Add comment

P117

Amendment 397 Marie-Christine Boutonnet [Change] § 15 [By] 15. souligne que la capacité de relier librement une ressource à une autre constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet; demande au législateur européen de clarifier que la référence à des œuvres par le biais d'un hyperlien n'est pas soumise aux droits exclusifs, vu qu'elle ne forme pas une communication à un nouveau public12 ; supprimé__________________ 12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne). Or. (Origine FR)

Add comment

P118

Amendment 398 Constance Le Grip (FR)
[Want to Change] § 15
souligne que la capacité de relier librement une ressource à une autre constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet; demande au législateur européen de clarifier que la référence à des œuvres par le biais d'un hyperlien n'est pas soumise aux droits exclusifs, vu qu'elle ne forme pas une communication à un nouveau public12 ;
__________________

12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne)
[By] 15. souligne que la capacité de relier une ressource à une autre, notamment au moyen d'un hyperlien, constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet et rappelle que ces hyperliens peuvent aussi bien mener à des oeuvres protégées qu'à du contenu libre de droits;
__________________

12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne).

Add comment

P119

Amendment 399 Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Sergio Gutiérrez Prieto, Eider Gardiazabal Rubial, José Blanco López [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Hace hincapié en que la capacidad de efectuar libremente conexiones entre distintos recurso de los pilares fundamentales de Internet; insta al legislador de la UE a establecer claramente que la referencia a obras mediante un hipervínculo no está sujeta a derechos exclusivos, ya que no constituye una comunicación a un público nuevo12 ; 15. Hace hincapié en que la capacidad de efectuar libremente conexiones entre distintos recursos es unode los pilares fundamentales de Internet; insta al legislador de la UE a clarificar los supuestos en los que el establecimiento de vínculos no constituyen un acto de comunicación a unpúblico primario en línea con la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia C-466/12 de 13 de febrero de 2014, caso Svensson;__________________ __________________12 Auto del Tribunal de Justicia, de 21 de octubre de 2014, en el asunto C-348/13, Besarte International Gamba v MichaelMeses and Stefan Porsche (petición de decisión prejudicial del Tribunal Federal Supremo alemán). 12 Auto del Tribunal de Justicia, de 21 de octubre de 2014, en el asunto C-348/13, Besarte International Gamba v MichaelMeses and Stefan Porsche (petición de decisión prejudicial del Tribunal Federal Supremo alemán).Or. (Origine ES)

Add comment

P120

Amendment 400 József Szájer [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Notesthat the ability to link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet and underlines that any further legislation must accurately reflect the existing definitions and principles setin the European case law, stating that when the hyperlink allows the recipients to circumvent the restrictions on access to the protected work, so that can access the protected work, which was otherwise unavailable to them,then this constitutes a communication to a new publicand it is subject to exclusive rights;__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof).Or. (Origine EN)

Add comment