Amendment 401 Jean-Marie Cavada (FR)
[Want to Change] § 15
souligne que la capacité de relier librement une ressource à une autre constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet; demande au législateur européen de clarifier que la référence à des œuvres par le biais d'un hyperlien n'est pas soumise aux droits exclusifs, vu qu'elle ne forme pas une communication à un nouveau public12 ;
__________________

12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne).
[By] 15. souligne que la capacité de relier une ressource à une autre par le biais d'un hyperlien constitue certes l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet mais que, dans certains cas, la liaison et l'incorporation peuvent être considérées comme une communication à un public nouveau et, par là même, constituer une atteinte au droit d'auteur;
__________________
12

Amendment 402 Angelika Niebler [Change] § 15 [By] 15. betont, dass die Möglichkeit der freien Verlinkung von Quellen zu den Kernbausteinen des Internets gehört; fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf klarzustellen, dass der Verweis auf ein Werk mittels Hyperlink nicht Gegenstand eines Ausschließlichkeitsrechts ist, da er keine neue öffentliche Wiedergabe darstellt12 ; 15. betont, dass die Möglichkeit der freien Verlinkung von Quellen und der Schutz geistigen Eigentums zu den Kernbausteinen des Internets gehört; stellt fest, dass der Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union einen ausgewogenen Ausgleich auf Grundlage der Richtlinie 2001/29/EG getroffen hat12;__________________ __________________12 Beschluss des Gerichtshofes vom 21. Oktober 2014 in der Rechtssache C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH gegen Michael Mebes und Stefan Potsch (Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Bundesgerichtshof - Deutschland). 12 Beschluss des Gerichtshofes vom 21. Oktober 2014 in der Rechtssache C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH gegen Michael Mebes und Stefan Potsch (Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Bundesgerichtshof - Deutschland).Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 403 Mary Honeyball [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is an important feature of the internet, but stresses that under certain circumstances, embedding and linking may be prejudicial to the rights of the creator; further stresses the need to accurately reflect the existing definitions and priniciples set out in European case law;__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof).Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 404 Axel Voss [Change] § 15 [By] 15. betont, dass die Möglichkeit der freien Verlinkung von Quellen zu den Kernbausteinen des Internets gehört; fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf klarzustellen, dass der Verweis auf ein Werk mittels Hyperlink nicht Gegenstand eines Ausschließlichkeitsrechts ist, da er keine neue öffentliche Wiedergabe darstellt12 ; 15. stellt fest, dass die Möglichkeit der Verlinkung von Quellen ein Element der Internetnutzung ist und betont,dass die Verwendung eines Hyperlinks gemäß entsprechender europäischer Rechtsprechung erfolgen muss, nämlich, dass sie nicht zur Umgehung der Zugriffsschranken auf ein ursprünglich geschütztes und den Nutzern unzugängliches Werk führen darf12 ;__________________ __________________12 Beschluss des Gerichtshofes vom 21. Oktober 2014 in der Rechtssache C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH gegen Michael Mebes und Stefan Potsch (Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Bundesgerichtshof - Deutschland). 12 Beschluss des Gerichtshofes vom 21. Oktober 2014 in der Rechtssache C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH gegen Michael Mebes und Stefan Potsch (Ersuchen um Vorabentscheidung: Bundesgerichtshof - Deutschland).Vgl. auch: Beschluss des Gerichtshofes vom 13. Februar 2014 in der Rechtssache C-466/12, Fall SvenssonOr. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 405 Angel Dzhambazki, Sajjad Karim [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Notesthat the ability to freely link content lawfully made availablefrom one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; highlights the importance of enhanced user information regardingobligationsfor anyone who knowingly provides hyperlinks to unauthorised content or links that circumvent paywalls;calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12;__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof).Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 406 Cecilia Wikström [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the free and open internet; calls on the EU legislator to further clarify that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12;__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof).Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 407 Therese Comodini Cachia, Pavel Svoboda, Marc Joulaud, Constance Le Grip, József Szájer, Giovanni Toti, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Milan Zver, Sabine Verheyen [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Notesthat the ability to link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet and underlines that any further legislation must accurately reflect the existing definitions and principles setin the European case law stating that when the hyperlink allows the recipients to circumvent the restrictions on access to the protected work so that can access the protected work which was otherwise unavailable to them,then this constitutes a communication to a new publicand it is subject to exclusive rights.__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 408 Enrico Gasbarra, Silvia Costa [Change] § 15 [By] 15. sottolinea che la capacità di creare liberamente collegamenti tra una risorsa e un'altra è uno dei capisaldi del funzionamento di internet; esorta il legislatore unionale a chiarire che il riferimento a un'opera attraverso un collegamento ipertestuale (hyperlink) non è soggetto a diritti esclusivi, in quanto non costituisce una comunicazione che raggiunge un pubblico nuovo12 ; 15. sottolinea che la capacità di creare liberamente collegamenti tra una risorsa e un'altra è uno dei capisaldi del funzionamento di internet; esorta il legislatore unionale a chiarirelo status diun'opera raggiungibile attraverso un collegamento ipertestuale (hyperlink),tenendo anche conto della recente giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia;__________________ __________________12 Ordinanza della Corte di giustizia del 21 ottobre 2014 nella causa C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH/ MichaelMebes, Stefan Potsch (domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Bundesgerichthof tedesco). 12 Ordinanza della Corte di giustizia del 21 ottobre 2014 nella causa C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH/ MichaelMebes, Stefan Potsch (domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta dal Bundesgerichthof tedesco).Or. (Origine IT)

Amendment 409 Virginie Rozière, Mady Delvaux (FR)
[Want to Change] § 15
15. souligne que la capacité de relier librement une ressource à une autre constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet; demande au législateur européen de clarifier que la référence à des œuvres par le biais d'un hyperlien n'est pas soumise aux droits exclusifs, vu qu'elle ne forme pas une communication à un nouveau public12 ;
__________________
12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne).
[By] 15. souligne que la capacité de relier librement une ressource à une autre constitue l'un des éléments fondamentaux de l'internet; demande au législateur européen d'intégrer dans son droit positif la jurisprudence de la CJUE afin que la référence à des œuvres par le biais d'un hyperlien ne soit pas soumise aux droits exclusifs, vu qu'elle ne forme pas une communication à un nouveau public12; rappelle que cette possibilité doit être strictement limitée aux liens renvoyant vers des contenus librement disponibles; rappelle que le régime de responsabilité des intermédiaires pointant vers des contenus illicites devrait être renforcé, notamment par la révision de la directive e-commerce;
__________________
12 Ordonnance de la Cour de Justice du 21 octobre 2014 dans l'affaire C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH contre Michael Mebes and Stefan Potsch (demande de décision préjudicielle de la Bundesgerichtshof d'Allemagne).

Amendment 410 Julia Reda, Josef Weidenholzer [Change] § 15 [By] 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the internet; calls on the EU legislator to make it clear that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to a new public12 ; 15. Stresses that the ability to freely link from one resource to another is one of the fundamental building blocks of the Internet; calls on the EU legislator to clarify that reference to works by means of a hyperlink is not subject to exclusive rights, as it does not consist in a communication to the public;__________________ __________________12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof). 12 Order of the Court of Justice of 21 October 2014 in Case C-348/13, BestWater International GmbH v MichaelMebes and Stefan Potsch (request for a preliminary ruling from Germany’s Bundesgerichtshof).Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 411 Christian Ehler, Sabine Verheyen, Marc Joulaud [Change] § 15 a (new) : 15 a. Suggests a review of the liability of service providers and intermediaries in order to clarify their legal status and liability with regards to copyrights, to guarantee that due diligence is exercised throughout the creative process and supply chain, and to ensure a fair remuneration for creators and rightholders within the European Union.Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 412 Marietje Schaake [Change] § 15 b (new) : 15 b. Calls for an end to geoblocking, as it prevents the emergence of a single digital market and hinders citizens access to information for which they have already paid taxes;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 413 Marie-Christine Boutonnet [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. demande au législateur européen de s'assurer que l'utilisation de photographies, de séquences vidéo ou d'autres images d'œuvres qui se trouvent en permanence dans des lieux p u b l i c s s o i t p e r m i s e ; 1 6 . L a s i m p l e p r é s e n c e d ' u n e Su v r e d a n s l ' e s p a c e p u b l i c n ' e n l è v e p a s à l ' a u t e u r s e s d r o i t s ; O r . < O r i g i n a l > { F R } f r < / O r i g i n a l >

Amendment 414 Ivan Jakovcic

Amendment 415 József Szájer [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. Calls on the EU legislator to ensure that the use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in public places is permitted; 16. Invitesthe EU legislator to recognise that the use of photographs, video footage or other images of works, which are permanently located in public places shall be considered to be in the public domain, where that use is for a non-commercial purpose or scale;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 416 Constance Le Grip [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. demande au législateur européen de s'assurer que l'utilisation de photographies, de séquences vidéo ou d'autres images d'œuvres qui se trouvent en permanence dans des lieux publics soit permise; 16. souligne que l'utilisation commerciale de photographies, de séquences vidéo ou d'autres images d'œuvres qui se trouvent en permanence dans des lieux publics devrait toujours faire l'objet d'une autorisation préalable des auteurs ou de leur société d'auteurs;Or. (Origine FR)

Amendment 417 Axel Voss [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. fordert den Gesetzgeber der EU auf sicherzustellen, dass die Nutzung von Fotografien, Videomaterial oder anderen Abbildungen von Werken, die dauerhaft an öffentlichen Orten platziert sind, gestattet ist; 16. erkennt an, dass die Nutzung von Fotografien, Videomaterial oder anderen Abbildungen von als gemeinfrei geltendenWerken, die dauerhaft an öffentlichen Orten platziert sind, für den nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch gestattet ist;Or. <Original>{DE}de</Original>

Amendment 418 Angel Dzhambazki, Sajjad Karim [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. Calls on the EU legislator to ensure that the use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in public places is permitted; 16. Callsforthe Commission toreport on the implementation of the Directivewith regard to progress onincreasing awareness for consumers regarding exceptions and limitations,in particular with regard to differences across the EU, including use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in public places;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 419 Cecilia Wikström [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By] 16. Calls on the EU legislator to ensure that the use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in public places is permitted; 16. Calls on theCommission topropose in thereview of Directive 2001/29/ECthat the use of photographs, video footage or other images of works which are permanently located in public places shall be permitted;Or. (Origine EN)

Amendment 420 Tonino Picula [Change] § 16 Motion for a resolution [By]